About 20+ years ago I wrote a paper on swarming warfare. As noted such warfare was characterized by:
Swarming has been characterized by Arqilla and Ronfelt as
follows:
1. Autonomous or semi-autonomous units engaging in convergent assault
on a common target
2. Amorphous but coordinated way to strike from all
directions
3. “sustainable pulsing” of force or fire
4. Many small, dispersed,
inter-netted maneuver units
5. Integrated surveillance, sensors, C4I for
“topsight”
6. Stand-off and close-in capabilities
7. Attacks designed to disrupt
cohesion of adversary
Now with the use of drones and sophisticated netted multimedia communications one obtains a significant advance in this technique.
DoD, now called War, should have been addressing this issue in detail. The PRC sure has been. Consider this as an attack by yellow jackets, before one knows it the swarm has in a coordinated manner attacked the poor victim.
This is a new paradigm in warfare. Low costs attack platforms and counter persons destruction. Does the Russian forces have this? Not yet but the PRC may use this as a training opportunity. Beware!
One strategy for attack is the use of low yield neutron devices. A 5kT device can be tucked in a small drone, and such a device destroys living matter but leaves structures unharmed. It also can be readily accessed after deployment. This was a 1980s proposed strategy. However then there were no drones. Now the cost of deployment is low and the success ratio very high. Such a strategy can clear an enemy force in hours and allow re-entry the next day. Thus one asks; what is a counter-force strategy?