Frontinus was a Roman Engineer who was one of the principals behind the building of the aqueducts. It is worth reading his works, htey provide insight to structures that have lasted 2000 years.
Now a union coordinator writes in the NY Times that electricians, especially union ones, are a prime reason we should build data centers willy nilly across our suburbs. He does note:
The debate shouldn’t be data centers,
yes or no. Instead, it should center on the rules and who enforces them.
Over the years, the best operators I have worked with, CloudHQ, Equinix
and Stack Infrastructure, have been genuinely responsive to community
concerns, working hard to mitigate noise, improve aesthetics and invest
in technologies that reduce environmental impacts. And yes, there are
impacts. Innovation in energy and
resource efficiency, though, is not just a reaction to criticism — it’s
central to the industry’s success. Communities that partner with data
centers on water-recycling systems, transparent power-purchase
agreements and community benefit agreements that specify the host area’s
gains before any permits are issued deliver real revenue and real jobs
with manageable costs. Communities that allow developers to write their
own rules have, predictably, suffered worse outcomes.
Yes, the community should be involved. But the data center builders are rushing head strong into massive construction before any of the questions are even addressed.
My father and brother were IBEW members and I worked along side my father. The unions can be powerful entities for better or worse. But jobs alone are not the driver.
Also for anyone who has ever built such facilities, I have, installation is but one step. Operations are different. The install jobs are transient, they do not last. Thus the argument has a fundamental fallacy. Operators want a few people as possible. Get the job done and move on.
Oh, and yes, aqueducts were built by slaves!
As Sextus Julius Frontinus stated:
Still before us is the topic of maintenance of the conduits.
But before I speak of this, a few comments should be set forth on the
working-crew established for that purpose.
There are in fact two such crews, one belonging to the state, the other
to Caesar. …Monies for the public crew are paid from the state treasury, an
expense which is offset by revenue collected from properties associated with
the water system: these consist of lands or buildings situated near the
conduits, delivery-tanks, …or basins. … This income, close to 250,000
sesterces, had been lost to its intended purpose and credited to some other
account;… but the Deified Nerva with a due sense of right restored it to the
populace, and I have given painstaking attention to bringing it under fixed
rules, that it might be entirely clear which places were subject to this tax. Caesar's
crew receives monies from the imperial treasury, from which payments are also
made for all lead and for all expenses relating to the conduits and
delivery-tanks and basins.
Thus the problem has been with us for millennia.