The book by Michel, a biography of Etienne Gilson is well worth the read. Gilson was a Thomist scholar as well as a classic French intellectual. At a time when France welcomed Sartre, Gilson also played a significant role in the rejuvenation of Thomistic thought. I had studied Thomas Aquinas in college, as did most Catholic students in my day, late 50s to early 60s, before the Vatican II renovation of Catholicism. One must understand the structure of intellectual thought in this period. It was structured and had certain underlying logical assumptions that were open to later critiques. Gilson addressed these issues for the modern reader.
This is an exceptionally readable biography of Gilson, from his youth until his final days. It discusses his interactions with other French intellectuals, his move to Toronto, and his position as a 20th century Thomas alongside Maritan. I would strongly recommend this work to anyone interested in Gilson and this period. Regrettably I am not a Thomist but bent more towards Ockham. Where Aquinas integrated Aristotle into the theology and philosophy he presented, it was Ockham who made a break in many ways to what we see today. Aquinas became a saint and Ockham was excommunicated, albeit by a heretical pope.
Understanding Thomism is facilitated by Gilson more than Maritain in my opinion. Thus understanding the man and his life is a sine qua non to understand the Church and its beliefs. One should remember that Leo XIII, the image of who the current Bishop or Rome uses, made Thomistic thought the sole path for Catholic learning. Gilson's views may be a path to understanding that nexus.
Posts
