Showing posts with label Verizon. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Verizon. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2026

Is Verizon Getting that Bad?

 I just ordered a new phone. Paid for it and it was to be sent. Verizon used:

DHL FWD DFILL GROUND  

Now this is some screwed up amalgam of DHL and UPS which got lost somewhere in northern NJ. Impossible to track and guess I will have to deal with the incompetents at Verizon. 

That company is close to total implosion. Fortunately my pension is with Prudential now and not these incompetents! 

Wednesday, January 14, 2026

Dumb, Dumber, Dumbest

 Well here goes. Some 35 years ago I was SVP and COO of NYNEX Mobile soon to become Verizon Wireless. The interesting thing I found out was in those days the least favored employees were sent there, the better ones assume wireless was just a fad. After all the old company had guaranteed earnings whereas wireless was competitive.

I recall once I asked the head of a region what her market share was. She said fifty fifty with the other player. I knew the answer, she had less than 20% and was clueless. She was from NY Tel. Churn was 20% per month, there being no reason for resellers to not do it since they had no retention policy. The list goes on.

Today Verizon has had a massive collapse. Now consider this:

They tell you to log onto their site. But the site demands that you enter a code sent to your cell phone. But if the service is down you will never get the code. Dumb, dumber, dumbest! 

Never ask telephone types to design or implement anything. And worse with a company with over $160 billion in debt beware of their cost cuttings. The place needs a clean sweep! 

Tuesday, March 18, 2025

Two Pieces of Toast


 

 I took a trip to a Verizon store to buy a new mobile phone. The trip reminded me of Jack Nicholson in Five Easy Pieces. All he wanted was two pieces of toast. The waitress was less than customer friendly. This also was the folks at Verizon. Here goes:

1. I walked into the store and dutiful registered my presence. I then waited about twenty minutes as the two sales folks go finished with their customers.

2. Then a sales person came to me and "demanded" to see my drivers license. I made my first mistake, I asked "why". She then responded as some KGB agent at the border indicating it's the "rule", but lacking an accent. She now supposedly knew I was who I was and she asked my why I was there. I assume perhaps she may have thought it was for an oil change or some bark mulch. I noted I wanted to buy a new Samsung phone to replace my old one which she held in her hand.

3. Off to the set of phones which I had already perused and I said to her, "This one". Well she was now non-stop. I was being told about improved plans, discounts on phones, monthly charges, but no two pieces of toast. I told her I was here just to but "this phone". She then told me she did not like my attitude. I told her I would write the CEO. She then told me she would get the manager! Gone! She frankly in my opinion was one of the nastiest and arrogant individuals I have ever met. My refusal to play along with her script just drove her to total instability.

4. So I stood there, no toast or phone, waiting I assume for the "Manager"

5. Then after a bit the "Manager" cam out. He wore a light grey crumpled sweat shirt, scruffy beard, gold chain around his neck, full head of black curly hair. An extra from Jersey Shore perhaps.

6. I then said I want to "buy this". He began the same litany as the sales clerk. I said "Stop, I want this" He look shocked. I repeated "I want to buy this"

7. Finally he looked at me and said he did not have it in stock but could send it to me. I said, "Why not tell me that in the first place" and out I went. No "toast" and no phone.

One wonders why Verizon has been performing so poorly. Well to find out just try to get "two pieces of toast" Clearly the company had developed the worst culture and the most incompetent management I have ever seen.

Oh yes and BTW, I was a Senior VP and COO of NYNEX Mobile, the predecessor of Verizon Wireless. I always told my folks, "If all else fails listen to the customer!" Clearly they have forgotten this. I thought of writing the CEO but after he almost a decade at the helm he has, in my opinion and my experience, single handedly destroyed a great company.

Sunday, January 1, 2023

Verizon Untethered, A Review

 Verizon Unthered is a book by McMurray about the time Ivan Seidenberg was at Verizon. 

First it must be noted that this is a book about Ivan Seidenberg and not by Ivan Seidenberg. If the notices are correct the primary author is McMurray with inserts by Charan. The book is a hagiography of the subject and via that a presentation of the evolution of Verizon from the time of the ATT breakup in the early 80s to about 2019. Unlike the book by Coll, TheDeal of the Century, which is a brilliant exposé of the actual ATT breakup, this work is a view of the evolution of one of the Baby Bells from then to almost now. Likewise unlike the classic book by Alfred Sloan, My Years with General Motors, the book does not purport to be a personal reflective.

 Prior Nexus

 It is worth reflecting that I worked for Seidenberg in the early 90s. Two issues are quite insightful. First, both he and I agreed that I needed no title, no rank, and all that was known was I reported to him. My job was to clean up messes that had resulted from poor choices from acquisitions. The closest I got was an introduction to the Board as “Doctor Death”. My second observation was at a meeting with Seidenberg about planning, the VP of HR told a tale about the types of people in the various former ATT elements. He noted that; “the A students went to Bell Labs or ATT, the B students to Western Electric or Long Lines, and the C students to the operating companies”. I tried to deconstruct that remark, initially as humor. But there I was an MIT PhD, having worked at Bell Labs, with all those C students. It was no longer humorous; it was a fundamental definition of “culture”. Culture is a theme that pervades this book, especially in the dicta by Charan.

 Death of Wireline

 The wireline business is the old copper line telephony. I recall that in 2002 I wrote a paper for OSTP, the White House Science Advisor’s Office on the Imminent Collapse of Telecommunications Industry. The point was twofold. First wireline was being disintermediated by wireless and second IP, Internet Protocol, was displacing classic telephone networking. Clearly Seidenberg saw that and his actions to bolster wireless by scale, thus the Bell Atlantic deal and then to sell off many rural properties to companies like Frontier et al was prescient. However the recognition of IP came a bit too late.

 Evolution of Wireless

 Wireless was a displacement technology. It required less capital per subscriber than copper and had shorter evolutionary lifetimes. Namely we see it go from 1G to 5G in relatively short periods as compared to the time between crossbar mechanical switches and electronic switching. Scale is critical because it can drive down the costs. But it is just infrastructure, and the value added is de minimis. Moreover wireless was unlike the old telephone world, there was competition. Dealing with competition was something the old Bell companies had no experience in. One of my early experiences was explaining that in the real world that profit was revenue less expenses whereas in the regulate world profited was a return on assets, no matter how inefficient you may have been. Thus the Seidenberg approach is laid out his typical manner of bringing competing elements together and letting the best one win. The result was a Bell Atlantic victory and a dismemberment of the old NYNEX mobile, a brilliant move.

 FIOS

 Fiber to the home sounds like a great idea. I actually tried it out in the US in the early 2000s after doing some in Europe. However it is very costly. It is tens of thousands per mile just to run the fiber, then costs to acquire and equip customers, and then to have the culture to provide content and maintain customers. The most significant barrier to entry is the CATV incumbents. They are brutal, they hold the high ground, many own the very content you want to provide.

 How Verizon ever managed to present a viable business case is beyond reason. But they did. Here I think Seidenberg may have allowed the folks to go well beyond their capabilities. The Telco people are street fighters where as the Cable folks are strategic warriors. The true barrier to entry is the incumbent, and the Verizon management did not seem to truly grasp that issue. Thus lots of unused fiber. It does not age as well a good wines.

 FLAG

 FLAG was a global fiber network. It was a great idea , a first, and it demanded great skills to implement. The problem there was again culture. As staff requirement were needed they drew from the operating company base. Unfortunately, few if any even had a passport, no less international business skills. The book I believe fails to see the less in this failure.

 MCI Acquisition

 MCI was left hanging after WorldCom collapse. It had a sales culture and its acquisition by Verizon was spot on. It added an element that was missing, the ability to deal with large business customers and provide them with excellent fiber backbone networks. The discussion in the book about this are well worth the read.

 The World of Content

 Probably the biggest business mistake made by the company was the acquisition of AOL and Yahoo. AOL was done in 2015 and Yahoo 2017. I recall that in 1996 I was teaching at Columbia Business School and one case I did was on AOL. I noted that AOL’s business model was defunct and that in many ways it was then just a Potemkin village. Yet 20 years latter after multiple signs of failure Verizon buys it. Then Yahoo. The they all get dumped at great loss to the shareholders. The book lacks any self-reflective understanding of the reasons why this happened.

 Deals, Deals, Deals

 In many ways this is a book about deals. Some were great, MCI for instance, some were disasters, AOL. Seidenberg shows brilliance in executing deals that lie in his plane of competence.

 Missed Opportunities

 The Internet space seems like a major set of missed opportunities. But it has always been a blind spot for Telcos. That is strange since in the late 80s my colleague at NYNEX was building and supporting NYSERNET, the IP based network for NY schools. It later became PSI, one of the first Internet carriers. I recall I asked Bob Kahn, a father of the Internet to give a talk to senior NYNEX management about the Internet in 1987. After the talk the head of MIS came to me and berated me for having such a fool speak. This would never happen, no Internet! This was the cultural base of the missed opportunity.

 However Seidenberg saw some of this with GTE and BBN but the slowness to respond may have been driven by regulatory issues. There also was Genuity, an international carrier populated by NYNEX folks that had a great opportunity but alas went bankrupt. That too was in my view a cultural failure.

 Overall

 The major deficit of this book is the lack of any self-reflection and moreover any assessment of the weaknesses of any of the principals involved. It reads that every step and decision was at times stressful but had flawless results. My assessment is based upon being an inside observer but not an insider. I had come from the competitive world of cable and start ups before rejoining NYNEX/Verizon, and thus I had poor political skills, if any, but strong entrepreneurial capabilities and experience. Thus my assessment is filtered by that predisposition. In my experience, Seidenberg was a brilliant organizational politician and utilized people to their best. He kept the company well situated through a complex period and managed to see it grow exceptionally well. His successors, not so well.

 Finally the style of the book in my opinion is chaotic. It is a staccato of vignettes about one deal after another interspaced with charts of aphorisms by Charan, that real like power points from a Harvard Business School lecture. There is some chronological flow but little exogeneous environment inclusions showing what may have drivers to decisions.

 However, Verizon has lost 50% of its market value in the last year (2022). It had dumped AOL and the other “ego” driven buys and attempts to use 5G as a springboard. However, the management never really comes to ask the key question: “What business are we in”. I would say perhaps the need a Lou Gerstner who resurrected IBM after the collapse of large main frames.

Tuesday, December 11, 2018

Told Them So

Recode reports:

It was easy to predict that Verizon would end up regretting the $10 billion or so that it had invested in AOL and Yahoo. The two companies used to define the internet, but by the time the phone company bought them, they were long past their prime. And no one except Priceline has ever revived a faded consumer internet company — once it’s done, it’s done. Now Verizon has formally acknowledged that it, too, can’t turn AOL and Yahoo around and has written off $4.6 billion of the money it spent buying the two properties. The playbook from here on out calls for a series of staff cuts and asset sales, followed by more writedowns, followed by more cuts, etc. This one contains multiple teachable moments. Just wishing that there was an alternative to the Facebook/Google advertising duopoly doesn’t make it so, for instance. Then again, Facebook and Google can look at the demise of two of the internet’s most powerful companies and remind themselves that this could be their fate, too.One particular lesson you can take from this even if you’re not an internet giant, past, present or future: Giant megadeals don’t belong to the companies that make them. They belong to the executives that make them. And if those execs leave, the deals can go, too.

I only "kind of" agree. The problem is CEO and other top management egos. I was there and I saw it before this one. Verizon has made many such mistakes. In my opinion only Seidenberg managed exceptionally well. Many others wanted to be in the "media" business. Fundamentally they were "pole climbers" and not "media moguls" The AoL deal and worse the Yahoo deal made no a bit of sense and the Boards of these entities are generally "politically correct" collections who have no idea about the core business.

Perhaps the new management of Verizon will get it right. They are an entity with certain exclusive assets, frequency bands, that they can monetize in a multiplicity of ways. They are still a monopoly like company, along with AT&T. So focus, focus, focus. I understand how difficult it is to get Directors who know something especially when running a politically visible business, but try to get a few. Reality can be expensive, but at least the new management seems to have same grasp on it.

Let's hope so. I wish them luck.

Sunday, September 30, 2018

5G Security

In a recent Analysts Meeting reported by Total Telecom, Verizon is noted as:

“Verizon’s view of the role of 5G in its enterprise services portfolio goes several steps further. Its view is that with the advent of 5G, the Internet of Things (IoT), along with SDN, video, security telematics, and edge computing, will expand to become a foundational enabler of the real-time enterprise (RTE), in which businesses can exploit information, actions and events the moment they occur," 

Now I am a strong promoter of wireless and 5G, whatever it turns out to be when first out the gate provides a wireless Gbps platform which can be rapidly deployed.

However, and this is critical, there are two concerns.

1. Security: Unlike fiber which can be made physically secure, yet still subject to interjection physically, 5G wireless opens itself up to massive interdiction via sophisticated jamming. It is highly vulnerable and if one were ask an investment back to move from fiber to 5G I suspect and I hope there would be a great deal of soul searching. The vulnerabilities of 5G are minion. This is not a marketing gimmick, it is a real full time job. Hopefully they have someone who can do this.

2. Functionality: Here I fault Verizon for not addressing a simple problem. Namely in their current 4G system they "sell" a 4G replacement for a wireline phone. EXCEPT! It is NOT a replacement. It is a spit and bailing wire design that fails to replicate what the wireline phone does. No 911, no caller ID, one phone or extension per 4G unit, etc. Whoever designed this should be sent back to the minors, or worse. But this is a harbinger of what can happen in 5G, but many times worse. Verizon in my experience lacks the competence in blending technology and marketing into product design. It is outsourced and thus they rely on the "kindness of strangers" to get it right. This may be a bump in the road for residential users but it could be a business killer for the high end business.

 One can say, enough with the buzz words from the pitch masters and try to adhere to the old dictum; if all else fails listen to the customer!

Friday, September 7, 2018

Course Correction - Verizon

It appears that in Total Telecom they report that Verizon seeks to unload their social media ventures; AOL and Yahoo. They note:


Oath has previously acquired Yahoo and AOL but has yet to carve its own niche as an online service and content provider. Tim Armstrong, CEO of Verizon's web based business unit, Oath, is said to be in talks with the company's board of directors to step down from his role, according to reports in the press.The Wall Street Journal reported that Armstrong has decided to walk away from his role as Verizon mulls a change of direction for Oath.

My comments is; what took them so long! For example they own the Huffington Post, a left wing online publisher of opinion, and not clear how much cash flow it generates.

Verizon must understand its basics. It own licenses, and 5G, if properly done, can be a winner. They tried in 4G to get wireless in the home. The system they deployed was in my professional opinion a total disaster. It puts a nano hub in the home and allows for a single RJ-11 jack with no 911, no caller ID and the list goes on. The should have a system which connects to the incoming twisted pair and replaces the copper! Simple, anyone who ever worked in the old telephone company would understand this. Not the new breed of marketeers who are off shoots of OATH.

Hopefully the new CEO, a Swede, can be more focused.  Dump the social media stuff, telephone companies are infrastructure owners and operators. Stay out of the media business, you just do not understand it.

Oh yes, and remember, if all else fails listen to the customer!

Friday, August 24, 2018

What Happened to the Old Telephone Company?

The story about Verizon Wireless closing down data access to the California Firefighters as noted in Ars Technica is an example of what happens when a monopoly is no longer considered a monopoly. It also seems in my opinion to be the result of a management team who seem not to be American, mostly Europeans, and have no idea as to the long telecom culture of pitching in during tragedies. Instead they seem to be driven by wringing out ever nickel.

As the article notes:

This is not the first time we have had this issue. In December of 2017 while deployed to the Prado Mobilization Center supporting a series of large wildfires we had the same device with the same sim card also throttled. I was able to work through Eric Prosser at the time to have service to the device restored and Eric communicated that Verizon had properly re-categorized the device as truly "unlimited". In the email below Verizon is stating that they can restore the device for an extra $2/month. I obviously lack the authority to make such an approval. If we could get Verizon [to get] that approval I would appreciate it.

In the old days when I was there we immediately turned to in any tragedy, adding capacity and even sending personnel and equipment. It appears that the new management seem to think they can totally disregard their customers even in times of need.

If this happens to firefighters in California just imagine what the plain old customer has to deal with. There unfortunately is no remedy available. It is a Pity, there was once a culture of support, now the culture is one of draining the last ounce of blood!

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Eating One's Young

There is an interesting tale in Fast Company about Yahoo. They note:

According to John Sullivan, a talent management consultant who advises firms on recruiting strategies, this strategy failure shouldn't come as a huge shock. "Most mergers don’t work," he says. Only a few big companies acquire smaller organizations successfully, and it’s a very thoughtful process. "It’s like divorced families joining," he adds. The big issue with Yahoo was that it simply did not have the system in place to cultivate the new talent and make them feel part of the new company. "Yahoo has a bad habit of killing the products [it buys]," Sullivan says. "It doesn’t make you feel welcome." A few examples of the dozens of startup products Yahoo bought and then shut down include MessageMe, Vizify, and EvntLive. Many companies are simply not good at acquiring. Sullivan used to work at Hewlett-Packard, and he noted the stifling culture that often led to unhappy new entrants. To get talent to work well under new management, they have to be enthusiastic. The new company should look exciting—a place where they can continue to do their work. By appearances, Yahoo is likely not that place. Sullivan points to Facebook, whose campus is filled with perks like "a free ice cream store." Just the space itself, he believes, could likely energize new additions. Sullivan adds that Facebook's ethos is designed to build and innovate new products. In contrast, Yahoo's office and internal culture, says Sullivan, doesn't appear (from his outsider's perspective) to have that kind of startup excitement.

So why does Verizon think it can do what Yahoo did not accomplish? Having watched Verizon since my NY Tel days in 1964, that is some 52 years, both within and without, one thing is clear. The "immune system" of Verizon rejects anything new. So the above mentioned problem with Yahoo will certainly not be remedied by Verizon. If anything it will be accelerated.

All one has to do is look at those whom Verizon brought in from the outside, the average tenure was less than four years. Their replacements were long time company stalwarts. Not that they really were any better, in fact they were often worse, look at Genuity, but the system will not accept new folks. Even those who started there and then returned!

Can a company change this cycle. I have yet to see it happen. It is often not the CEO who does it but the corporate culture. The resentment of the old times, the pole climbers, the Community College grads who resent the Harvard and Stanford grads. It just does not seem to work. Period!

Sunday, July 24, 2016

Watch the Stock

Verizon it seems has decided to buy Yahoo for some $5 billion per the BBC. They state:

US internet firm Yahoo announced in February that it was looking at "strategic alternatives" for its core internet business. Verizon declined to comment on the reports. A formal announcement is expected on Monday before US markets open for trading. Over the last few years Yahoo has struggled to keep up with the changing internet advertising landscape, with some analysts arguing that it has failed to remain relevant in many of its core markets.

The key question the shareholders should ask is what is the basis of this valuation. Verizon has value because it owns licenses to spectrum. That is an asset and one can value that. Really.

However what does Yahoo own? Customers? No, they can disappear in a heart beat. Then what is the basis for this valuation? Good question.  Let's see how they spin this one.

Now look at the Balance Sheet.


In Millions of USD (except for per share items)  As of 2016-06-30
Cash & Equivalents  1,325.40
Short Term Investments  5,055.68
Cash and Short Term Investments  6,381.09
Accounts Receivable - Trade, Net  991.18
Receivables - Other  -
Total Receivables, Net  991.18
Total Inventory  -
Prepaid Expenses  224.73
Other Current Assets, Total  -
Total Current Assets  7,597.00
Property/Plant/Equipment, Total - Gross  -
Accumulated Depreciation, Total  -
Goodwill, Net  431.37
 Intangibles, Net  202.12
Long Term Investments  34,412.45
Other Long Term Assets, Total  245.12
Total Assets  44,214.29
Accounts Payable  171.62
Accrued Expenses  982.86
Notes Payable/Short Term Debt  -
Current Port. of LT Debt/Capital Leases  -
Other Current liabilities, Total  122.03
Total Current Liabilities  1,276.51
Long Term Debt  1,266.28
Capital Lease Obligations  -
Total Long Term Debt  1,266.28
Total Debt  1,266.28
Deferred Income Tax  13,115.82
Minority Interest  32.41
Other Liabilities, Total  159.38
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity  15,850.40
Redeemable Preferred Stock, Total  -
Preferred Stock - Non Redeemable, Net  -
Common Stock, Total  -
Additional Paid-In Capital  -
Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit)  -
Treasury Stock - Common  -
Other Equity, Total  28,363.89
Total Equity  28,363.89
Total Liabilities & Shareholders' Equity  44,214.29
Shares Outs - Common Stock Primary Issue  -
Total Common Shares Outstanding  948.25























































































Friday, July 22, 2016

Greater Fool Theory

The "greater fool theory" is a basic principle in the financial markets and real estate. If one buys something it is a good deal only if someone else at a later time will pay you more.

Now in business reasonable people examine revenue potential, look at cash flows on a projected basis, consider contingencies.

In the mid 90s I taught a finance course at Columbia Business School and one case was AOL. I saw it as a total zero. My students saw it differently. Warner bought it and it almost destroyed the company.

Now Verizon wants Yahoo. Why? What "value" does it have? Verizon has assets in licenses, exclusive rights to ever increasing assets. Yahoo has nothing. As a shareholder and former executive, I really wonder who came up with this idea.

As the NY Times reports:

The end of Yahoo as an independent company may be near, and Verizon — long considered the leading contender to buy the aging web pioneer — is the most likely acquirer. The two companies are in advanced talks over a takeover of Yahoo that could be worth close to $5 billion, a person briefed on the matter said on Friday. Any transaction would be for Yahoo’s core internet business, although it is unclear whether a deal would also include other assets like real estate or patents. Both companies are hoping to announce a deal as early as next week, this person said. Verizon is scheduled to report earnings on Tuesday. Still, no final deal has been reached and the talks could still falter, the person cautioned. One of the other finalists could also re-emerge with a higher bid. A spokesman for Verizon declined to comment, while a Yahoo spokeswoman said the company would not comment “until we have a definitive agreement to announce” because it wanted to maintain “the integrity of the process.” 

How does one monetize this company. It has not for wont of trying, yet they are still a dead pig. Verizon is in the infrastructure business. It has never, and I mean never, demonstrated its ability in content. Look at AOL. Now egos may drive the deal but from a fiduciary duty perspective it should be cash flow. That is currently elusive.