Lawyers are different. You are billed for everything. Let's try writing a contract. Now many business people know more about contracts than attorneys, why, because they have lived through the bad ones. A first year associate would be clueless.
Take a will, in most cases a cut and paste. Yet some firms I have seen will spell the clients name different ways on the same page and get gender mixed even as often. If that is the case what else have they messed up on?
The Times states:
“The fundamental issue is that law schools are producing people who are
not capable of being counselors,” says ...., the general
counsel of FMC Technologies, a Houston company that makes oil drilling
equipment. “They are lawyers in the sense that they have law degrees,
but they aren’t ready to be a provider of services.”
The simple task of filing a lawsuit, a will, of finding the right window in the Courthouse and getting the right form comes only from experience. Most often a law school grad is clueless of even where the Court House is no less understanding the difference between them.
Imagine a physician not knowing where to insert the needles to withdraw blood, it is at that level. Is that a bad thing, not really if the law firm takes upon itself the burden of training the apprentice. Low pay commensurate to say an Intern. But that has often not been the case, first year stars were getting almost $200,000 pa on Wall Street before the collapse.
Law often is learned by doing. Writing a contract, writing a brief, filing a law suit, deposing a witness, crossing a witness, and the reading of depositions. Done by doing, so does this mean that perhaps law school grads should go through a system akin to physicians, low pay for say four years, and not be charging clients. Perhaps it is worth considering, equity after all.