I have read Augustine and his Theory of Evil. It basically is the lack of good. But evil is a powerful word, a real powerful word. We call Hitler Evil. That has true meaning.
But today Francis tweets:
Inequality is the root of social evil.
With all due respect to The Bishop of Rome, does this mean all inequality is Evil? Some people run better than others, is that Evil? Some people make better investments than others. Is that Evil?
When one makes such a sweeping indictment then it often tends to reduce the strength of the word.
The Guardian jumped on this quickly. As they say:
But in last autumn's essay, Evangelii Gaudium, Francis wrote that:
"Just as the commandment 'Thou shalt not kill' sets a clear limit in
order to safeguard the value of human life, today we also have to say
'Thou shalt not' to an economy of exclusion and inequality. Such an
economy kills … Today everything comes under the laws of competition and
the survival of the fittest, where the powerful feed upon the
powerless. As a consequence, masses of people find themselves excluded
and marginalised: without work, without possibilities, without any means
of escape. Human beings are themselves considered consumer goods to be
used and then discarded." The claim that human beings have
an intrinsic value in themselves, irrespective of their usefulness to
other people, is one that unites Christianity and socialism. It can be
even found somewhere in the shadows of Marxism, but there humans gain
their value from history, and when they stand in its way, that's tough
for them, as the millions of Stalin's victims could tell us. But if you
think the market is the real world, it makes no sense at all, since in
the market, value is simply the outcome of supply and demand.
Yes people have individual value, that is the essence of individualism. Yet humans each have a duty to perform, to maximize their potential. Humans ultimately must answer for what they have made of their lives, either to themselves or God. Survival of the Fittest is a view of nature that has a basis in fact. It may not be a norm for social interaction.
I wonder what Augustine would think of this Bishop of Rome?