A rhetorician is not concerned to educate the people
assembled in law courts and so on about right and wrong; all he wants to do is
persuade them, I means. I shouldn’t think it’s possible for him to get so many
people to understand such important matters in such a short time.
We have our MIT Professor of Economics who in today’s world
in my opinion is a hybrid of Gorgias and Protagoras. A Rhetorician and Sophist,
one who twists the words in public to not to educate but to persuade, not to
enlighten, but to obfuscate those elements which may negate the value of the
proposal.
Perhaps it is worth reading Plato again and to understand that
those who distrust the people’s acumen and seek to promote a plan by the use of
words of little value should be adjudged accordingly. We all now view a sophist
and a twister of words and abuser of truth.
In the Academy perhaps we should return to understanding the
truths from Socrates and Plato, not those of the speakers of fine words.