In a recent NIH study there was an attempt to demonstrate that fat calories were more effective in adding body fact than carbohydrate calories.
The procedure was as follows:
The researchers studied 19  non-diabetic men and women with obesity in 
the Metabolic Clinical Research Unit  at the NIH ..... Participants stayed in the  unit 24 hours per day 
for two extended visits, eating the same food and doing  the same 
activities. For the first five days of each visit they ate a baseline  
balanced diet. Then for six days, they were fed diets containing 30 
percent  fewer calories, achieved by cutting either only total carbs or 
total fat from  the baseline diet, while eating the same amount of 
protein. They switched diets  during the second visit. 
They conclude:
“Our data tell us that when it comes to body  fat loss, not all diet 
calories are exactly equal,” .....“But the real  world is more 
complicated than a research lab, and if you have obesity and want  to 
lose weight, it may be more important to consider which type of diet 
you’ll  be most likely to stick to over time.”  
Now there are several issues here:
1. The sample is much too small
2. The duration time is much too short
3. The switching is in the middle of a metabolic change which takes possibly weeks, not hours to adapt.
4. The key issue is the definition of a calorie. Namely if we measure 3500 Kcal = 1 pound, then how do we differentiate at all?
This is not in my opinion a study of any value for the above and many other reasons.
 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
