The Economist has a good piece which is worth a read:
His central insight was that firms exist because going to the market all  the time can impose heavy transaction costs. You need to hire workers,  negotiate prices and enforce contracts, to name but three time-consuming  activities. A firm is essentially a device for creating long-term  contracts when short-term contracts are too bothersome. But if markets  are so inefficient, why don’t firms go on getting bigger for ever? Mr  Coase also pointed out that these little planned societies impose  transaction costs of their own, which tend to rise as they grow bigger.  The proper balance between hierarchies and markets is constantly  recalibrated by the forces of competition: entrepreneurs may choose to  lower transaction costs by forming firms but giant firms eventually  become sluggish and uncompetitive.
The transaction costs are what gets us in the end.
 

 
 Posts
Posts
 
