It states:
They conclude:
What Might Policymakers Do Under These Circumstances?
They could address the short-term economic challenge by eliminating
or reducing the fiscal restraint scheduled to occur next year without
imposing comparable restraint in future years—but that would have
substantial economic costs over the longer run. Alternatively, they
could move rapidly to address the longer-run budgetary problem by
allowing the full measure of fiscal restraint now embodied in current
law to take effect next year—but that would have substantial economic
costs in the short run. Or, if policymakers wanted to minimize the
short-run costs of narrowing the deficit very quickly while also
minimizing the longer-run costs of allowing large deficits to persist,
they could enact a combination of policies: changes in taxes and
spending that would widen the deficit in 2013 relative to what would
occur under current law but that would reduce deficits later in the
decade relative to what would occur if current policies were extended
for a prolonged period.
Well someone must do something, but I suspect we will have to wait until after the election.