The US Navy has had and continues to have a unique role in
US international presence. On the one hand it has the function of protecting
the ocean borders of the United States, apart from the policing actions of the
Coast Guard. Second, it has the duty to ensure that US interests are protected
abroad, from threats, from attacks, and the like. For example if an enemy fleet
of whatever type were to attempt to breach the borders of the United States by
sea then the Navy has the duty to protect those borders. Also if U.S. ships,
persons, or even business were under threat on foreign seas or lands then the
Navy has the prime duty to send defense to protect those interests. That is
assuming they are allowed to.
Thus two decades ago the 6th Fleet roamed the Med
and if a Libyan attack had occurred then the fleet could launch jet attack
aircraft in minutes and helicopter relief ships in less than two hours. Now we
have most likely a few tugs in the Med, thus the Libyan disaster. Naples is at
best a port of repair, and the Med is open to all comers.
The Admirals of the type of King, Nimitz, and Spruance seem
no longer to exist, those there are politically tuned and thus avoid conflict
and in my opinion confuse the mission.
Let us examine the current fleet. There are 287 Deployable Battle Force Ships. Amongst that there
are only six Aircraft Carriers composed of the following: [1]
USS Enterprise (CVN 65) - 6th Fleet
USS Nimitz (CVN 68) - Pacific Ocean
USS Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN 69) - 5th Fleet
USS George Washington (CVN 73) - South China Sea
USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74) - 5th Fleet
USS Harry S. Truman (CVN 75) - Atlantic Ocean
Also there are only 6 Amphibious Assault Ships comprised of
the following:
USS Peleliu (LHA 5) - port visit Phuket, TH
USS Wasp (LHD 1) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Bataan (LHD 5) - Atlantic Ocean
USS Bonhomme Richard (LHD 6) - port visit Sepangar, MY
USS Iwo Jima (LHD 7) - 5th Fleet
USS Makin Island (LHD 8) - Atlantic Ocean
The typical Carrier Group is composed of 6-10 ships:
1.
1 Carrier: The carrier
provides a wide range of options to the U.S. government from simply showing the
flag to attacks on airborne, afloat and ashore targets. Because carriers
operate in international waters, its aircraft do not need to secure landing
rights on foreign soil. These ships also engage in sustained operations in
support of other forces.
2.
1 Guided missile cruiser
multi-mission surface combatant. Equipped with Tomahawks for long-range
strike capability.
3.
2 Guided missile destroyers
multi-mission surface combatants, used primarily for anti-air warfare (AAW)
4.
1 Attack submarine in a
direct support role seeking out and destroying hostile surface ships and
submarines
5.
1 Combined ammunition,
oiler, and supply ship provides logistic support enabling the Navy's forward
presence; on station, ready to respond
Now a ship is at sea for 4 months at a time. That means that
despite the fact that we have 6 Carrier groups we have only 2 at any one time
deployed under full condition. Thus given the current strength of the Navy we
have a truly weak presence. Thus, there most likely no way to react to Libya.
What should a naval strategy be? That is an oft debated
question. Do we still need a stealthy nuclear attack fleet? Would we use it and
against whom. Should the littoral fleet be expanded? Are we concerned about in
close warfare, and how complex should the littoral fleet be? One of the typical
Naval and DOD problems is that they take a simple ship concept such as the
littoral craft and turn it into a multi-billion dollar affair. Why not keep
them at say the old Fletcher class destroyers, sleek, light, and mobile. That
is a swarming attack and defense force. I have written extensively about this
in the past and rapid deployment and mobility at low costs are essential.
Reconnaissance can now be accomplished by various means and
methods from drones to the NRO fleet of satellites. C3I should be
well developed. The Navy should have an expansive mission with plans for
flexible roles in many theatres. China has one rebuilt nuclear carrier, not
that they cannot build a half dozen, but deploying them would take time. Russia
has reduced its presence. The nature of the enemy has changed. It is pirates in
the Indian, and frankly concerns about the shores of the homeland.
Thus frankly the dismissive comments by the current
president are not only to be concerned about but frankly they should be
terrifying. One should remember that on 9-11 we had only 2 unarmed
Massachusetts National Guard jets available for New York City. There were more Czech jest available for Prague! The prior administration had
gutted national defense assuming a new century of peace and when it comes to protecting ourselves we had not
one bullet.
Now the threat is magnitudes higher and the planning and
execution must meet the challenge. We need Admirals who can articulate a plan, reasons for why they need what. We must not retreat into the slumber of the 1930s, with not even the fuels to set the few ships asail.