It seems that there is a significant amount of new work being done on evaluating cancers via circulating tumor cells and their DNA. Another paper in Nature states:
Cancers acquire resistance to systemic treatment as a result of clonal evolution and selection.
Repeat biopsies to study genomic evolution as a result of therapy are
difficult, invasive and may be confounded by intra-tumour heterogeneity
Recent studies have shown that genomic alterations in solid cancers can
be characterized by massively parallel sequencing of circulating
cell-free tumour DNA released from cancer cells into plasma,
representing a non-invasive liquid biopsy.
Here we report sequencing of cancer exomes in serial plasma samples to
track genomic evolution of metastatic cancers in response to therapy.
Six patients with advanced breast, ovarian and lung cancers were
followed over 1–2 years. For each case, exome sequencing was performed
on 2–5 plasma samples (19 in total) spanning multiple courses of
treatment, at selected time points when the allele fraction of tumour
mutations in plasma was high, allowing improved sensitivity.
For two
cases, synchronous biopsies were also analysed, confirming genome-wide
representation of the tumour genome in plasma. Quantification of allele
fractions in plasma identified increased representation of mutant
alleles in association with emergence of therapy resistance. ...treatment with gefitinib.
These results establish proof of principle that exome-wide analysis of
circulating tumour DNA could complement current invasive biopsy
approaches to identify mutations associated with acquired drug
resistance in advanced cancers. Serial analysis of cancer genomes in
plasma constitutes a new paradigm for the study of clonal evolution in
human cancers.
Cancer Research UK commented on the works as follows:
Scientists ...
used traces of tumour DNA, known as circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA)
found in cancer patients’ blood to follow the progress of the disease as
it changed over time and developed resistance to chemotherapy
treatments.
They followed six patients with advanced breast, ovarian and lung cancers and took blood samples, which contained small amounts of tumour ctDNA, over one to two years.
By looking for changes in the tumour ctDNA before and after each
course of treatment, they were able to identify which changes in the
tumour’s DNA were linked to drug resistance following each treatment
session.
Using this new method they were able to identify several changes
linked to drug-resistance in response to chemotherapy drugs such as
paclitaxel (taxol) which is used to treat ovarian, breast and lung
cancers, tamoxifen which is used to treat oestrogen-positive breast
cancers and transtuzumab (Herceptin) which is used to treat HER2
positive breast cancers.
And they hope this will help shed new light on how cancer tumours
develop resistance to some of our most effective chemotherapy drugs as
well as providing an alternative to current methods of collecting tumour
DNA – by taking a sample direct from the tumour – a much more difficult
and invasive procedure.
As we noted in a previous note regarding the same set of procedures by others researchers this is a useful method to detect the progression of cancer.
However the following observations are of note:
1. Are these coming or going cells, namely are the cells on their way to a metastasis or the result of one.
2. Can we use these cells to determine the changes in DNA expression as the cells progress.
3. How effective a prognostic tool are these measurements.
4. What therapeutic methods can be applied now knowing this information.
Thus is this data of primary use or secondary. Notwithstanding its clinical use it does represent an excellent tool for genomic progression.
Reference:
Murtaza M et al, Noninvasive analysis of acquired resistance to cancer therapy by sequencing of plasma DNA (2013) Nature.