The CBO released their latest estimates. They contend:
Over the 2017–2026 period, CBO and JCT estimate, the legislation
would reduce the on-budget deficit by at least $133 billion, the
projected savings from the House-passed reconciliation bill. (The
effects on the deficit were estimated relative to CBO’s March 2016
baseline, as has been done for all legislation related to the 2017
budget resolution.) Those savings would occur mainly because, under the
legislation, outlays from new block grants between 2020 and 2026 would
be smaller than the reduction in net federal subsidies for health
insurance. Funding would shift away from states that expanded
eligibility for Medicaid under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and toward
states that did not. The number of people with comprehensive health insurance that covers
high-cost medical events would be reduced by millions compared with the
baseline projections for each year during the decade, CBO and JCT
estimate. That number could vary widely depending on how states
implemented the legislation, although the direction of the effect is
clear. The reduction in the number of insured people relative to the
number under current law would result from three main causes. First,
enrollment in Medicaid would be substantially lower because of large
reductions in federal funding for that program. Second, enrollment in
nongroup coverage would be lower because of reductions in subsidies for
it. Third, enrollment in all types of health insurance would be lower
because penalties for not having insurance would be repealed. Those
losses in coverage would be partly offset by enrollment in new programs
established by states using the block grants and by somewhat higher
enrollment in employment-based insurance. Many of the new programs would
probably cover people with characteristics similar to those of people
made eligible for Medicaid by the ACA. The decrease in the number of insured people would be particularly
large starting in 2020, when the legislation would make major changes to
federal funding for Medicaid and the nongroup market. CBO and JCT
expect that market disruptions and other implementation problems would
accompany the transition to the block grants created by the
legislation—despite the availability of funding specifically designated
to assist with that transition—given the short time for planning and
making changes between now and then.
This is a lot of effort for nothing. The major problems are:
1. Central Government control of everything.
2. An absurd Electronic Health Record system designed by people who seem in my opinion to have no clue as to how medicine functions.
3. Excess reporting of details that are useless.
4. Lack of change in key sectors such as torts etc.
5. Funding of absurd entities like PCORI.
I let you all be the judge.