In a just released re-study of the PCa mortality and PSA tests the authors note:
Screening was estimated to confer a 7% to 9% reduction in the risk for
prostate cancer death per year of MLT. This translated into estimates of
25% to 31% and 27% to 32% lower risk for prostate cancer death with
screening as performed in the ERSPC and PLCO intervention groups,
respectively, compared with no screening...After differences in implementation and settings are accounted for, the
ERSPC and PLCO provide compatible evidence that screening reduces
prostate cancer mortality.
And the reasons are what he had noted when these, in my opinion fatally flawed, trials were performed.
Perhaps they could now calculate how many mend died as a result.
As Eureka notes:
After differences in implementation and settings were accounted for, two
important prostate cancer screening trials provide compatible evidence
that screening reduces prostate cancer mortality. These findings suggest
that current guidelines recommending against routine PSA-based
screening may be revised. However, questions remain about how to
implement screening so that the benefits outweigh the potential harms of
overdiagnosis and overtreatment.
It is a shame!