In almost all regulating laws there is a front section defining what is regulated. But 2 years ago I detailed the problems with AI, namely how does one define it so it can be regulated? Legislators and administrations are really the worst, and dare I say incompetent, entities to define this.
We know that basically AI is composed of three things. First the processors or hardware. Second the complex software structures. Third the massive amounts of data. Therein lies the problem, Each is unique, each is ever changing, and each by itself cannot be adequately defined.
We can regulate the telephone network of days of yore, we can regulate the electrical network, but we cannot even try to define AI dispositively. So stop with the regulation. Otherwise you may need a separate Supreme Court just to regulate the regulation!
Posts
