California has enacted what could be called the anti-AI law related to politics. It states in part:
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)California is entering its first-ever generative artificial intelligence (AI) election, in which disinformation powered by generative AI will pollute our information ecosystems like never before. Voters will not know what images, audio, or video they can trust.
(b)In a few clicks, using current technology, bad actors now have the power to create a false image of a candidate accepting a bribe or a fake video of an elections official caught on tape saying that voting machines are not secure, or to generate the Governors voice telling millions of Californians their voting site has changed.
(c)In the lead-up to the 2024 presidential elections, candidates and parties are already creating and distributing deepfake images and audio and video content. These fake images or files can spread to millions of Californians in seconds and skew election results or undermine trust in the ballot counting process.
(d)The labeling information required by this bill is narrowly tailored to provide consumers with factual information about the inauthenticity of particular images, audio, video, or text content in order to prevent consumer deception.
(e)In order to ensure California elections are free and fair, California must, for a limited time before and after elections, prevent the use of deepfakes and disinformation meant to prevent voters from voting and to deceive voters based on fraudulent content. Accordingly, the provisions of this chapter are narrowly tailored to support California's compelling interest in protecting its free and fair elections.
Now this is an example of what I was concerned about. It does not even define AI. It goes even further in calling it an AI election, yet we have no idea what AI is. If I were to use my Pentax and another a SONY camera, both pictures would be modified by the camera, Reality does not exist in an image, it is just a processed view of reality. Is that AI perhaps.
If someone wants to show their opponent in a less positive light, then by modifying an image, is that AI?
The above is a classic example of why Chevron made no sense. Who gets to decide the above terms? What is a free and fair election.
Turley has a different slant but it supports in parallel my concerns. On the one hand is the free speech issue on the other hand is the grossly deficient use of terms which one suspects the Legislature of California is using.
Posts
