Tuesday, April 28, 2020

The Plan?

We think it is worth a bit to examine the New Jersey Governor's proposal to reopen the state. Let us go down each step.

Principle 1: Demonstrate Sustained Reductions in New COVID-19 Cases and Hospitalizations

• 14-day trend lines showing appreciable and sustained drop in cases, hospitalizations, and other metrics;
• Hospitals stepping down from functioning under crisis standards of care.

Now as we have been saying for two months, we need metrics, numbers, which we can attach to the process. The problem in the above is twofold. First as we have noted again and again there is no reliability, consistency credibility in the numbers provided. I have given a multiplicity of examples, the death total being a prime example. Second, just what number are we focusing on. This proposal is vague and lacks and form of transparency even if the numbers were valid. We have done a multiplicity of 14 day trends and all seem to be well into the negative range. But, alas, that uses the poor numbers and the metrics I chose. What is the Governor choosing? He is, in my opinion, playing Three Card Monty as are most politicians since they do not have a clue. Finally transparency is critical. People must see the numbers day by day, they must have access to the details, subject to HIPPA, and this Three Card Monty scheme of the government must disappear. Otherwise there is no trust, and people are losing trust very quickly.

By the way, here is the data for New Jersey and Morris County with a 14 day running average by day for changes in new cases. I wonder if this is what they want to measure, if so Free Morris!
If numbers count then what are we counting?

Principle 2: Expand Testing Capacity

• At least double current diagnostic testing capacity;
• Prioritize testing for health care workers, essential personnel, and vulnerable populations;
• Create a flexible testing plan accessible to all residents;
• Expand partnerships with institutions of higher education, private-sector labs, and the federal government.
• Ensure that those who test positive are linked to a health care provider.

This is a no-brainer. I had thought that Rutgers, the state university, had developed and implemented just such a test. If so then where is it? I suspect it is just another academic public relations push, then disappears into the land of being the unreproducible. But apart from that as we had suggested more than a month ago the ability to get testing kits sent to a home, on site testing, drug chain testing and the list goes on. This above looks like some McKinesey chart I have seen many times before. Lots of words and no specifics. The answer is simple; just do it, don't chart it.

Principle 3: Implement Robust Contact Tracing

• Recruit and deploy an army of personnel who will identify and follow-up with contacts;
• Leverage technological data and innovative solutions to increase efficiency;
• Coordinate the approach of local and state health officials, which will have a coordinated county/regional component.

The "army" quote is terrifying. Yes contact tracing must be done, as we do in many highly communicable diseases. Technical approaches are many, none yet proven, and we have discussed these at length months ago. Each has strength and weakness. One should recall how we tried all of this during the AIDS epidemic and there was a bit of a revolt. Perhaps it may be even more of a revolt here as well.

Principle 4: Secure Safe Places and Resources for Isolation and Quarantine

• To the greatest extent possible, provide individuals who do test positive in the future with a safe and free place to isolate and protect others from COVID-19;
• Ensure that quarantined contacts are provided supportive services, if needed.

This one is terrifying, truly. Do they mean that if one tests positive then "shelter in place' of whatever must be abandoned and the state comes in and takes you to a state run quarantine. That in my opinion is a death sentence and hopefully the Constitution still holds sway somewhere. Although one wonders as politicians get more and more power. Quarantine is a term of art. Here the term of art seems to expressly imply depriving an infected person of their freedom without due process and sending them to a quarantine camp, most likely to die. I believe we fought a World War against such people, if memory serves me correctly. Also if people see this putative death sentence if they get tested, then testing may fall by the wayside, since if you get tested and are positive, well you know the answer now. Also, perhaps then the state will demand that everyone be tested, and those they deem positive, and yes there are false positives, are taken from society and sent to the quarantine camps. I wonder who wrote this recommendation?

Principle 5: Execute a Responsible Economic Restart

• Create the Governor’s Restart and Recovery Commission to advise on the process and recommend responsible
and equitable decisions;
• Plan for a methodical and strategic return to work based on level of disease transmission risk and essential
classification;
• Continuation of social distancing measures where feasible and appropriate;
• Leverage any available federal funds and programs to support health care, individual, and small business recoveries.

The above seems to be the prototypical palaver of the politicians. First thing to do when you have no ideas; create a commission.

Principle 6: Ensure New Jersey’s Resiliency

• Learn from the lessons of COVID-19 and prepare for the possibility of a resurgence;
• Ensure hospitals, health care systems, and other health delivery facilities have inventories of personal protective
equipment and ventilators;
• Build our own state personal protective equipment and ventilator stockpile;
• Create a playbook for future administrations for the next pandemic.

Simply stated, the above seems to say that the state should not be caught with its trousers down again. Good idea.